IELTS Writing band 7.5 chủ đề Education theo dạng Agree or Disagree

IELTS Writing band 7.5 chủ đề Education theo dạng Agree or Diagree

Hãy cùng xem qua bài viết mẫu IELTS Writing band 7.5 chủ đề Education theo dạng Agree or Diagree, cập nhật một số từ vựng cùng với ideas cùng chủ đề nhé!

Bạn có thể tham khảo những chủ đề khác phần thi IELTS Writing và cùng với những khóa học IELTS cấp tốc nhé!

Education is considered vital for the future of any society in today’s world. Governments throughout the world should make education compulsory for all children between the ages of 5-15 years. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?

Education provides the opportunity to live a prosperous life by securing a good job or establishing a business. Some people argue that governments all over the world should make education compulsory / mandatory for all children in the 5-15 age group. In my opinion it is a positive development because education is the best tool to get success.

The first reason to support the view that education should be compulsory is its power to eradicate poverty from the society. Millions of illiterate people living in developing countries are deprived of their basic rights such as food and shelter.  They are exploited at the workplace by their employers who pay them less for more work. Education will make them aware of their rights and enable them to earn more for their families. Even uneducated people living in developed countries are able to earn well and get respect because in those countries, employers are required to pay at least the minimum hourly wages determined by the government. This is not the case in poor countries where illiterate people get neither money nor respect. Needless to say, they need education to get out of poverty and exploitation.

Another reason to support compulsory education is that it will reduce the crime rate in the society. Studies have shown that uneducated people are more likely to get into crime because they don’t have a stable source of income. It is, therefore, clear that if the people are educated, the crime rates will be low.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that education plays a crucial role in improving the living standards of both the individuals and the society and hence it should be made compulsory for all children.

Các bạn cần hỗ trợ thông tin về khóa học IELTS cấp tốc, đăng ký ngay để nhận được tư vấn miễn phí về khóa luyện thi IELTS cấp tốc!

Từ vựng và cấu trúc câu IELTS hay trong bài:

Lưu ý:

• Việc sử dụng từ vựng đa dạng và chính xác là rất quan trọng để đạt điểm cao trong IELTS.

• Các cấu trúc câu phức tạp và từ nối logic sẽ giúp bài viết mạch lạc và dễ hiểu.

• Nên áp dụng linh hoạt các từ vựng và cấu trúc câu này vào các bài viết khác nhau, tùy thuộc vào chủ đề và yêu cầu của đề bài.

Đề bài số 2: The debate surrounding single-sex versus co-educational schooling is a long-standing one, with proponents on both sides offering compelling arguments. While some believe that separating boys and girls creates a more focused learning environment, I firmly disagree with the notion that single-sex education is inherently superior. Co-educational schools, in my view, offer a more balanced and realistic preparation for life in the 21st century.

Bài mẫu:

Firstly, co-educational environments foster crucial social skills by providing opportunities for interaction between genders. Learning to communicate and collaborate effectively with people of different backgrounds, perspectives, and genders is an essential life skill. Single-sex schools, by their very nature, limit these interactions, potentially leading to social awkwardness and difficulties in navigating mixed-gender environments later in life.

Secondly, co-educational schools better reflect the realities of the workplace and society. In almost every profession, individuals will need to interact and collaborate with colleagues of both genders. Exposing students to this dynamic from a young age equips them with the interpersonal skills necessary to thrive in a diverse environment. Single-sex schools, on the other hand, create an artificial social bubble that can be detrimental to students’ ability to adapt to real-world situations.

Furthermore, the argument that single-sex schools eliminate distractions caused by the opposite sex is often based on outdated stereotypes. Assuming that boys and girls cannot focus on their studies in each other’s presence reinforces harmful gender roles and limits their ability to develop healthy, respectful relationships. Co-educational environments, when managed effectively, can actually promote mutual respect and understanding between genders.

In conclusion, while single-sex education may have some advantages, I believe that co-educational schools provide a more holistic and beneficial learning experience. By fostering social skills, reflecting real-world dynamics, and challenging gender stereotypes, co-educational schools better prepare students for the complexities and opportunities of modern life.

Từ vựng và cấu trúc câu (đề bài 2):

Đề bài số 3: Some people think that governments should spend more money on education for young children (5-10 years old) than on education for older students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Bài mẫu:

Investing in education is crucial for any nation’s future, and the allocation of resources across different age groups is a subject of ongoing debate. While education for older students is undoubtedly important, I firmly believe that governments should prioritize funding for younger children aged 5-10. This is because these formative years lay the foundation for all future learning and have the greatest long-term impact.

Firstly, early childhood education plays a vital role in cognitive development. During this period, children’s brains are highly malleable, readily absorbing information and developing essential skills like language acquisition, problem-solving, and critical thinking. Investing in quality early education programs provides young children with stimulating environments and experienced educators, maximizing their learning potential and setting them up for academic success later in life. A strong foundation in these early years can significantly reduce the need for remedial education later on, ultimately saving government expenditure in the long run.

Secondly, early childhood education has a profound impact on social and emotional development. Children learn to interact with their peers, develop empathy, and regulate their emotions within a structured learning environment. These social and emotional skills are crucial for navigating social situations, building healthy relationships, and becoming responsible citizens. Neglecting this aspect of development can lead to social and behavioral problems later in life, which can have far-reaching consequences for individuals and society.

While education for older students remains essential, it builds upon the foundation established in the early years. A solid grounding in fundamental skills and concepts during childhood allows older students to grasp more complex subjects and develop advanced cognitive abilities. Therefore, prioritizing early childhood education is not only beneficial for young children but also enhances the effectiveness of education at all subsequent levels.

In conclusion, although education at all levels is important, I believe that governments should prioritize funding for education for younger children aged 5-10. This investment yields the greatest long-term benefits by maximizing cognitive and social-emotional development, laying a strong foundation for future learning, and ultimately contributing to a more productive and prosperous society.

Từ vựng và cấu trúc câu (đề bài 3):